Tocmai mi-a venit o leapsa (nu pe trackball ci pe reader :P) de la Picsel

Dacă nu ştiţi regulili, iată-li:

1. Ia cartea care este cea mai aproape de tine.
2. Deschide-o la pagina 123.
3. Găseşte a 5-a propoziţie/frază.
4. Postează pe blog textul urmatoarelor 4 propoziţii/fraze cu aceste instrucţiuni.
5. Nu îndrazni sa scotocesti prin rafturi după cartea aceea foarte deosebită sau “intelectuală”.
6. Dă leapşa mai departe la alţi 6 prieteni.

Undoitrei, hai!

Cartea de pe birou :Zend PHP5 : Architect’s Certification Study Guide
Urmeaza citatul :

While PHP 4 allowed you to call any method of a class statically using the scope
resolution operator :: (officially known as Paamayim Nekudotayim—Hebrew for
“Double Colon”), PHP 5 introduces a stricter syntax that calls for the use of the static
keyword to convey the use of properties and methods as such.
You should keep in mind that PHP 5 is very strict about the use of static properties
and methods. For example, calling static properties using object notation will result
in a notice:

class foo {
static $bar = “bat”;
static public function baz(){
echo “Hello World”;
}
}
$foo = new foo();
$foo->baz();
echo $foo->bar;

This example will display:
foo::baz
Notice: Undefined property: foo::$bar in PHPDocument1 on line 17
It is necessary for the static definition to follow the visibility definition; if no visibility
definition is declared, the static method or property is considered public.

Dau mai departe leapsa pentru ADI, Iqpress, Sabina , Laura, Ioana si oricui nu are blog sau nu ii stiu adresa… postati aici in comentariu.
Spor!

2 Responses to “Leapsa”

1. Blog-less Ioana says:

   January 30, 2008 at 5:12 pm

   Aurora Liiceanu, Alice Nastase – Dincolo de bine, dincoace de rau; despre iubire
   “Atasamentul este o nevoie primara pe care multi o numesc iubire”
2. natasha aka diana says:

   January 30, 2008 at 9:10 pm

   cartea pe care o tin pe post de mouse pad: Brands & Branding, The Economist

   What might have appeared as a surface treatment, possibly even a shock tactic, had serious ambitions in the area of employee retraining and behaviour. BA rightly observed that a change in perception in the minds of its costumers would come only through a change in the experience they enjoyed from the begining to the end of their encounter with the airline. The identity, with its obvious message of diversity, was a catalist in significant internal change and, perhaps, a reflection of internal change that was already taking place and becoming visible. As a result BA people would master more languages in the future; they would be encouraged to be themselves with passengers; they would strive for the highest standards in service; and they would make this a self-fulfilling prophecy.

   can I take my mouse pad back, please? :)